- 1 What was the problem with tenant farming?
- 2 Why did tenant farmers struggle to be profitable?
- 3 What was tenant farming during reconstruction?
- 4 What was the effect of tenant farming in the South after the Civil War?
- 5 How did sharecropping help the economy?
- 6 Do tenant farmers still exist?
- 7 Why was sharecropping unfair?
- 8 What is the best description of a tenant farmer?
- 9 Why is sharecropping bad?
- 10 How were sharecroppers and tenant farmers similar?
- 11 What is the major difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?
- 12 How did tenant farmers pay rent?
- 13 What were the economic and social effects of sharecropping and tenant farming?
- 14 Was reconstruction a success or failure?
- 15 What was the major drawback of the sharecropping system?
What was the problem with tenant farming?
Some farmers lost their farms or their status as cash or share tenants because of crop failures, low cotton prices, laziness, ill health, poor management, exhaustion of the soil, excessive interest rates, or inability to compete with tenant labor.
Why did tenant farmers struggle to be profitable?
Why did tenant farmers struggle to be profitable? They could not sell enough cotton at high prices. The costs of caring for their land were too high. Americans had little interest in buying cotton.
What was tenant farming during reconstruction?
Tenant farming was a system designed to allow people without capital to gain access to land and work it as their own. In return for the privilege of pursuing the Jeffersonian ideal of the independent yeoman, tenant farmers paid the owners of the land in cash or in part of their crops.
What was the effect of tenant farming in the South after the Civil War?
Tenancy had always provided an element of economic flexibility in the Cotton Belt, but after the war tenanted farms, and especially sharecropping, became the principal means of mobilizing and controlling labor.
The high interest rates landlords and sharecroppers charged for goods bought on credit (sometimes as high as 70 percent a year) transformed sharecropping into a system of economic dependency and poverty. The freedmen found that “freedom could make folks proud but it didn’t make ’em rich.”
Do tenant farmers still exist?
There are more tenant farmers than migrant workers in 2015. The typical migrant worker will be Mexican or Central American and will travel from harvest to harvest across the country and will face a variety of working conditions depending on the laws of any given state and the sympathies of any given employer.
Laws favoring landowners made it difficult or even illegal for sharecroppers to sell their crops to others besides their landlord, or prevented sharecroppers from moving if they were indebted to their landlord. Approximately two-thirds of all sharecroppers were white, and one third were black.
What is the best description of a tenant farmer?
Tenant farming is an agricultural production system in which landowners contribute their land and often a measure of operating capital and management, while tenant farmers contribute their labor along with at times varying amounts of capital and management.
Sharecropping was bad because it increased the amount of debt that poor people owed the plantation owners. Sharecropping was similar to slavery because after a while, the sharecroppers owed so much money to the plantation owners they had to give them all of the money they made from cotton.
Tenant farmers usually paid the landowner rent for farmland and a house. They owned the crops they planted and made their own decisions about them. Sharecroppers had no control over which crops were planted or how they were sold.
what is the difference between sharecropping and tenant farming? Sharecropping is a system of agriculture or agricultural production in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crop produced on the land. A tenant farmer is onewho resides on and farms land owned by a landlord.
How did tenant farmers pay rent?
The farmer rented the land, paying the landlord in cash or crops. Rent was usually determined on a per-acre basis, which typically ran at about one-third the value of the crop.
The debts would increase as the years went by, and for planters in tenant farming, most could not keep up with the rent and had cheap tools or tools that were purchased on credit. Sharecropping and tenant farming resembled slavery, and African Americans were tied to their landowners because of their debts.
Was reconstruction a success or failure?
Reconstruction was a success in that it restored the United States as a unified nation: by 1877, all of the former Confederate states had drafted new constitutions, acknowledged the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, and pledged their loyalty to the U.S. government.
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers were typically harsh and restrictive. Many contracts forbade sharecroppers from saving cotton seeds from their harvest, forcing them to increase their debt by obtaining seeds from the landowner. Landowners also charged extremely high interest rates.