- 1 How long did sharecropping and tenant farming last in the South Brainly?
- 2 What long term effect did sharecropping have on the economy of the south?
- 3 What was sharecropping in the South?
- 4 What was the effect of tenant farming in the South after the Civil War?
- 5 How long did sharecropping and tenant farming last in the South into the 1870s?
- 6 How does tenant farming different from sharecropping?
- 7 Why was sharecropping unfair?
- 8 Did sharecropping help the economy?
- 9 Why is sharecropping bad?
- 10 Does sharecropping still exist today?
- 11 What were sharecroppers forbidden from growing?
- 12 Who did sharecropping most often harm?
- 13 How did the civil war weaken the Southern economy?
- 14 Was reconstruction a success or failure?
- 15 What were sharecropping and tenant farming and how did they affect the South?
Answer: Into the 1930’s. Explanation: Tenant farming and sharecropping became a way of life in the Cotton Belt.
What long – term effect did sharecropping have on the economy of the South? It provided a strong agricultural base so industries could develop. It produced surplus food, so more people worked in specialized jobs. It kept the region dependent on agriculture, especially cotton cultivation.
By the early 1870s, the system known as sharecropping had come to dominate agriculture across the cotton-planting South. Under this system, black families would rent small plots of land, or shares, to work themselves; in return, they would give a portion of their crop to the landowner at the end of the year.
What was the effect of tenant farming in the South after the Civil War?
Some farmers lost their farms or their status as cash or share tenants because of crop failures, low cotton prices, laziness, ill health, poor management, exhaustion of the soil, excessive interest rates, or inability to compete with tenant labor.
Sharecropping, along with tenant farming, was a dominant form in the cotton South from the 1870s to the 1950s, among both blacks and whites.
Both tenant farmers and sharecroppers were farmers without farms. A tenant farmer typically paid a landowner for the right to grow crops on a certain piece of property. With few resources and little or no cash, sharecroppers agreed to farm a certain plot of land in exchange for a share of the crops they raised.
Laws favoring landowners made it difficult or even illegal for sharecroppers to sell their crops to others besides their landlord, or prevented sharecroppers from moving if they were indebted to their landlord. Approximately two-thirds of all sharecroppers were white, and one third were black.
During Reconstruction, former slaves–and many small white farmers–became trapped in a new system of economic exploitation known as sharecropping. Nevertheless, the sharecropping system did allow freedmen a degree of freedom and autonomy far greater than they experienced under slavery.
Sharecropping was bad because it increased the amount of debt that poor people owed the plantation owners. Sharecropping was similar to slavery because after a while, the sharecroppers owed so much money to the plantation owners they had to give them all of the money they made from cotton.
Yes, sharecropping still exists in American and probably always will. It could be that sharecropping isn’t in fact what you imagine it to be. It is in fact just a way of paying for the use of some land, just think of it as rent. Technically, it isn’t rent but it is rent.
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers were typically harsh and restrictive. Many contracts forbade sharecroppers from saving cotton seeds from their harvest, forcing them to increase their debt by obtaining seeds from the landowner. Landowners also charged extremely high interest rates.
“African American sharecroppers ” were the ones among the choices given in the question that sharecropping most often harm.
How did the civil war weaken the Southern economy?
The civil war weakened the southern economy by placing heavy taxes on the states and the states were destroyed after the last battles of the war. Also, since slavery was abolished, the south could no longer use their free labor system and had to pay their workers.
Was reconstruction a success or failure?
Reconstruction was a success in that it restored the United States as a unified nation: by 1877, all of the former Confederate states had drafted new constitutions, acknowledged the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, and pledged their loyalty to the U.S. government.
The Effects of Sharecropping & Tenant Farming Sharecropping and tenant farming were the most widespread systems of agricultural labor in the postwar South. ‘ This requirement also kept sharecroppers and tenants from growing their own food, thus keeping them in debt to the landlord for sustenance.